Guides
What to Look for in AI-Powered Pentesting
The AI pentesting market spans a wide range of capabilities, from tools that simply wrap an LLM around existing scanner output to fully agentic systems that reason about a target, chain exploits, and validate findings autonomously. These approaches carry very different risk profiles and operational requirements, so understanding the distinction matters before you evaluate vendors.
This guide gives security leaders a framework for cutting through that noise. It defines what AI pentesting actually is (and isn't), maps the deployment models available, and provides a vendor evaluation framework with red flags, green flags, and a scoring checklist to run during a proof of concept.
What you'll find in this guide:
- A capability framework clarifying what AI pentesting is not (a better scanner, a red team replacement, or a fire-and-forget system), where it sits within Adversarial Exposure Validation, and how it compares to scanners and DAST across exploitability, false positive rate, and exploit chaining.
- The three deployment models (AI-Assisted, AI-Augmented, and AI-Led Autonomous) along with the ingestion requirements, downstream workflow needs, and current technical limitations to weigh when choosing the right level of autonomy for your team.
- A vendor evaluation framework, including core questions to ask across validation, autonomy, integration, and governance, a red flag vs. green flag comparison, and a scored checklist for structuring a proof of concept.
Speakers.
No items found.
